前期索然無味鋪墊的很無聊
中期急劇轉(zhuǎn)變畫風(fēng)暴露人性
后期講真沒理解，看不懂導(dǎo)演要表達(dá)什么
只覺得最后這幾句話有意義 是個(gè)雞肋的劇情片吧[img=4:C][/img][img=5:C][/img][img=2:C][/img][img=1:C][/img][img=8:C][/img][img=6:C][/img][img=3:C][/img][img=7:C][/img]

Tom Hiddleston touched it. He read the book which I listened to. One Chapter, probably. I couldn’t get what it’s about. But I know it’s going to be heavy and dark. With movie, you can easily spend two hours on it and be briefed. Everything is too symbolic. How can I decipher it. The building, a closed system. The architect, the fundamental rule. Mr. Wild, the calling from bottom. Tom, sense, but it seems he killed everyone in his family and put them in the boxes. My God

剛看完抖森的《摩天大樓High-Rise》，設(shè)定、美術(shù)、卡司什么的都蠻好，結(jié)果劇本崩了...
唉，其實(shí)反烏托邦題材想講好世界觀，暴亂起義走流程到最后全員惡人或者破罐破摔沒關(guān)系，但是這個(gè)中間邏輯情節(jié)要過渡好，不然就挺突兀的。角色動(dòng)機(jī)其實(shí)可以多描述一下，甚至世界觀完全為人物服務(wù)也沒事，把角色情況講清楚也有意思。主角的100%中立人設(shè)其實(shí)蠻有趣的，人物背景可以深挖的點(diǎn)也蠻多，世界觀也有意思，但是好像兩邊都沒完全弄好，就模模糊糊的很可惜，夠荒誕卻各種意義上浮于表面，可惜。
看了編劇，一般般

“摩天大樓”就算光著也要有身漂亮的肌肉至少好看能勾起欲望
轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明網(wǎng)址: http://www.mmedi.cn/archives/id-35513.html