看這個(gè)電影是為了看海登,我看海登的影片一般都會(huì)把期待值降低,沒辦法,海登的演技確實(shí)比較玄幻,海登真是我喜歡的演員中唯一一個(gè)演技不夠顏值來(lái)湊的了??墒牵】赐赀@部電影后,我差點(diǎn)激動(dòng)的哭了!我家海登還是有演技的??!突然有種“學(xué)渣兒子考上了大學(xué)”的驕傲感,麻麻我好欣慰QAQ~~
這個(gè)電影的故事是根據(jù)真實(shí)事件改變的,我還是比較喜歡看這類電影的。因?yàn)榇蟛糠帜鼙桓木幍恼鎸?shí)事件都挺有意思的,只要改編的好,都有可看性。
電影沒有炫目的特效,沒有刺激的故事,沒有想象中那種說(shuō)謊者與揭發(fā)者激烈的斗智斗勇。說(shuō)謊者的謊言其實(shí)并不高超,跟犯罪大師莫利亞提差太多,他只是一個(gè)有小聰明的投機(jī)者,他利用一些漏洞達(dá)到成功的目的。揭發(fā)者其實(shí)也不是大偵探,之所以說(shuō)謊者沒有一下被揭發(fā)是因?yàn)樗且粋€(gè)好員工好同事,他有周圍人的信任。同事力挺他不說(shuō),就是那個(gè)他認(rèn)為針對(duì)他的新編輯,也是在事情剛發(fā)生時(shí),為他求情,希望那個(gè)發(fā)現(xiàn)造假的媒體放過(guò)他,“因?yàn)樗且粋€(gè)犯錯(cuò)的孩子”。但他們沒想到,這個(gè)公司的寵兒是個(gè)慣犯了。
這個(gè)故事給人很真實(shí)的感覺,它不僅是個(gè)…
20130315想看,那時(shí)我才研一。工作7年了,覺得這些光鮮亮麗的行業(yè)里都有大量的年輕且野心勃勃的表演者。新任主編壓力超大,接任時(shí)太年輕,難以壓得住團(tuán)隊(duì),偏偏遇上這樣一個(gè)屎盆子扣到風(fēng)扇上的事情。真實(shí)世界中的造假記者還真能演,讀完法律出來(lái)還寫本書叫the fabulist 。newyorker著名的事實(shí)核查制度,以前上學(xué)時(shí)看書看到過(guò)這個(gè)制度,成本極高,大受震撼,后來(lái)又分別在獨(dú)立的文章或電影中再看到這制度,也許是真的。時(shí)任院長(zhǎng)以及我導(dǎo)講話、寫書也言必稱新聞專業(yè)主義?,F(xiàn)在上班多年了,也干著和新聞沒關(guān)系的工作
From my perspective, the most impressive part was the checking system of The New Republic (exactly, from New Yorker).
When the article comes in, it will come to the senior editor, he or she edits it on the computer, and calls the writer to make revisions. Then the piece comes to the second editor, he revises it again, then goes fact check. Check every piece, every date, every title, every place or assertion, check and verified. Then the piece goes to the copy editor, he revises it once again. Then goes to the lawyer, who plays the own bound. The boss will look at it, too. He is very concerned about every comment the magazine has made. Then production takes it, then backs on the paper, then backs to the writer, then back to the copy editor, back to editor No.1, and editor No.2, back to the fact taker, back to the writer and back to production again. During the process, the lawyer rere…
“欲蓋彌彰”品質(zhì)炸裂!關(guān)于“新聞?wù)鎸?shí)” 映射當(dāng)下的新聞行業(yè)危機(jī) 值得一看
轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明網(wǎng)址: http://www.mmedi.cn/archives/id-70319.html