If there is anything I can still remember from my great world history teacher, then it would be to look at any historical events dialectically.
There is never concrete proof in history, and the idea of a movie can at most be the convey of some idea from a few to the people.
But sometimes that would be just enough. When the idea conveyed is so big that it can cause a wimple.
It is a confession, not all of us were like him (Hitler).
It may be true, it maybe not, but it doesn't matter today anyway. What matters is that there is a confession. Better late than never.
We hear it now.
So much better than some other nation who can't even dare to admit their crime, not even to mention a confession.

昨天陪老婆看電影，《目標(biāo)希特勒》
http://www.douban.com/subject/2028647/
據(jù)說(shuō)是德國(guó)版的山寨版，不過(guò)這個(gè)山寨版做得確實(shí)不錯(cuò)，也據(jù)說(shuō)，是因?yàn)榇笈频臍鈭?chǎng)強(qiáng)大所致。
看到豆瓣里很多豆油都在討論刺殺為什么不成功，其實(shí)我覺得，重點(diǎn)不在刺殺的結(jié)果，而在于刺殺行動(dòng)本身。如果把整件事情看成一個(gè)項(xiàng)目來(lái)操作的話，項(xiàng)目的簡(jiǎn)單流程是這樣：
取得希特勒的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)──>進(jìn)而與諸國(guó)和談──>避免殺戮
和談和避免殺戮才是項(xiàng)目的目的，而刺殺希特勒僅僅是取得他領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的一種方式而已。
事實(shí)上，整件事情失敗的原因在于關(guān)鍵的兩點(diǎn)：
1.那位將軍沒有及時(shí)派出軍隊(duì)，拖延了三個(gè)小時(shí)，導(dǎo)致蓋世太保的頭頭及時(shí)與希特勒聯(lián)系上；
2.沒有取得信息傳輸中心的控制權(quán)。
第一個(gè)問題是執(zhí)行力的不夠，沒有選對(duì)人，或者其實(shí)在整個(gè)實(shí)施團(tuán)隊(duì)中，除了別有所圖的政客，在事情開始前，沒有人真正意識(shí)到自己在做什么，自己能做什么，導(dǎo)致在執(zhí)行力上大打折扣。包括阿湯哥演的主角，鼓舞他的更多是對(duì)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的厭惡，身處其中的厭惡，而不是博大的悲天憫人的胸懷，這一點(diǎn)，很真實(shí)，很深得我心。

《行動(dòng)目標(biāo)希特勒》原來(lái)全世界英勇就義都是一樣一樣的呀
轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明網(wǎng)址: http://www.mmedi.cn/archives/id-1089.html